Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST), DENVER IIOriginal Citation – Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB. The Denver developmental screening test. J Pediatr. Aug; 7. View in Pub. Med. Contact Information. William K. Frankenburg MDDepartment of Pediatrics. University of Colorado Medical Centre. East Ninth Ave. Denver, Colorado 8. Denver Developmental Materials Inc.(8. Price & Availability – Can order through instrument website, download order form. Various training materials available. See website for price details. Brief Description of Instrument – Screening test, assessing developmental progress for children 0- 6 years of age.
Defines the ages at which children accomplish a broad variety of heterogeneous tasks. Scale Format – Check boxes, administrator notes, 1. Administration Technique – Interview/skill demonstration. Optimal if test administrator is trained. Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST), DENVER II. (1967). The Denver developmental screening. DENVER II Technical Manual contains training protocol. DDST-II: Denver Developmental Screening Test. Frankenburg, W.K., Dodds J. et al. DENVER II Training Manual. Denver Developmental Materials, Inc.. Denver II : training manual. [William K Frankenburg;] Home. WorldCat Home About WorldCat Help. Search. Search. alternateName ' Denver developmental screening test.DENVER II Technical Manual contains training protocol, available for order online. See website. Scoring and Interpretation – Scoring manual available, see website. Factors and Norms – Denver II Technical Manual contains tables depicting the standardization samples, specific characteristics of the potential items such as number of administrations for the standardization, number and percent of “refusal” and “no opportunity” scores, subjective ratings, covariable differences, and reliability. Also included are specifics of sample distribution, behaviour and speech ratings by age, K statistics, and 2. Test- retest Reliability – Testing on two occasions by 2 pairs of trained examiners. On the same day, the child was tested twice, after 5- 1. High rate of agreement observed. See update citation for details. Inter- rater Reliability – Same child rated by two examiners who did not have knowledge of how the other was scoring. Internal Consistency – Items to be included selected on 9- point criteria. See update citation for details. Construct Validity – Comparable to a growth curve, no hypothetical construct to measure. Criterion- Related Validity – Standardized to population norm. Responsive to Change Over Time – Age specific norms provided. Content & Face Validity – Validity of Denver II established by the precision with which the ages corresponding to 2. Strengths – Norms provided for population and subgroups. Training materials available to ensure accurate administration. Limitations – Appropriate referral criteria requires further study, no norms available since different communities have different criteria for referral. Notes for Consideration – Norms provided for USA, in original citation, other researchers have published standards for various regions, check literature. Updates – Frankenburg, WK., Dodds, J. The DENVER II: A major revision and re- standardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics 1. 99. View in Pub. Med. Published APN Studies using instrument –- Chappell JA, Drogos PA. Evaluation of infant health care by a nurse practitioner. Pediatrics. 1. 97. Jun; 4. 9(6): 8. 71- 7. View in Pub. Med. Koniak- Griffin D. Developmental assessment with the Denver Developmental Screening Test: An effective approach for clinical instruction and performance evaluation. Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families. Apr; 2(2): 1. 02- 1. View in Pub. Med. Thurber F. Di. Giamarino L. Development of a model of transitional care for the HIV- positive child and family. Clinical Nurse Specialist. Fall; 6(3): 1. 42- 6. View in Pub. Med. Related Methods Articles (Not Reviewed) – Glascoe, FP., Byrne et al. Accuracy of the DENVER II in developmental screening Ped. June; 8. 9; 1. 22. Frankenburg WK, Chen JH, Thornton SM. Common pitfalls in the evaluation of developmental screening tests. J Pediatr. 1. 98. Dec; 1. 13(6): 1. Greer S, Bauchner H, Zuckerman B (1. The Denver Developmental Screening Test: how good is its predictive validity? Dev Med Child Neurol. Dec; 3. 1(6): 7. 74- 8. Frankenburg WK, Ker CY, Engelke S, Schaefer ES, Thornton SM. Validation of key Denver Developmental Screening Test items: a preliminary study (1. J Pediatr. 1. 98. Apr; 1. 12(4): 5. K E Barnes and A Stark (1. The Denver Development Screening Test. A normative study. Am J Public Health. April; 6. 5(4): 3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2019
Categories |